It was generally accepted that there were two camps on Paris Hilton, during her cultural relevancy. 1) You believed Paris was a campy sort-of-fun cultural icon. In an era of glittery Princess themed bumper stickers, she was our Diana. In comic sans. 2) You believed Paris was the downfall of civilization.
I was of the former, and I want to think I was right. Yes, it is wrong that the culture elevates only the rich, white and privileged to the highest pinnacle of “It.” But Paris, as a cultural icon, had an alluring nihilistic quality. The world was Paris’ oyster and she emerged from it, extensions flowing gif-like, seemingly in control of her fame. Paris used her privilege to be famous and have fun. The moment she occupied was about not taking yourself so seriously. About taking nothing so seriously. And something about all of that felt comforting….
The moment Paris typified was about sex. “It was like this weird mélange of technology and sex and society. It was like a Tom Wolfian peek into the upper class, right into their sex life. And it touched on all these fears people had about technology and invasion of privacy,” says Vanessa. Paris was a mermaid in a petri dish of Napster, Internet Porn, cybering….
I wrote a piece about Paris Hilton… Read it at Thought Catalog
- jillssmile reblogged this from rachelrabbitwhite
- liqu0r-eyes likes this
- mitchellsunderland reblogged this from rachelrabbitwhite and added:
- gabatronic likes this
- babecaves likes this
- v1chyssoise likes this
- ch-urchmouth likes this
- inthebathysphere likes this
- whoopsie-daisy likes this
- thirdculturekid likes this
- rachelrabbitwhite posted this